Wedding Photographer Sued After Taking Inappropriate Pictures Rather Than The Couple

Steph and Paul Unwin tied the knot in the summertime of 2015. The pair of newlyweds, on the time, employed a marriage photographer by the title of David Kilcourse to be their marriage ceremony photographer. However in an article completed by The Mirror, Steph claims that the photographer took practically 100 footage of two of her bridesmaids which had been greater than the 70 that he took of the marriage couple.

The Mirror

David Kilcourse is a self-advertised marriage ceremony photographer and on the couple’s huge day, he snapped 96 footage of two bridesmaids with many centered on the ladies’s legs, cleavage, and behinds. In complete, he took 70 footage of the couple with solely 11 centered on the groom and no footage of the in-laws.

The newlyweds determined to rent David for a full package deal deal which ought to have include footage of the bride preparing, the marriage ceremony and occasion, meals, and in-laws. The ultimate product ought to have include a photograph guide, edited footage and a CD. When the ultimate product lastly arrived, the couple was disillusioned to seek out out that there was no picture album and the CD contained 1636 unedited footage, out of which 559 had been out of focus.

Moreover, Steph claims that any footage of her bridesmaids’ physique elements was ‘not an accident.’ The couple has since sued David in September of 2016 and was reimbursed 601 kilos since David didn’t present as much as courtroom.

The Mirror

PrevPage: 1 of 2Next

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *